Questioning seems to be a tried and try way of engaging students as they read. They can be asked at any time before, during, or after the reading. I remember teachers doing this with me when I was a student. Much like the anticipation guide, pre-reading questions can help student prepare for the material they are about to read. This allows them to know what to expect.
I liked the “right there” and “putting it together” questions that were mentioned. These are great ways to see if students are actually reading and if they comprehend what they are reading. It is as if the “right there” questions were asking them surface level questions and the “putting it together” questions were asking them to dig a bit deeper than the surface.
I can understand why even this simple QAR setup can be more complicated in practice. Reading comprehension is not like a math problem. It is not straightforward. There are so many levels of comprehension, and this can vary from reading to reading depending on the subject matter. It can also be hard to pick out what to ask questions about to discover students comprehension. A student may understand one aspect and not pick up on another. I know we talk a lot about “main ideas” when we measure comprehension, but that alone may not be enough to test student knowledge.
I know one thing that helps is asking questions that involve your input or opinion. You have to understand the material to a certain level to give your opinion. This also helps students stay away from just scanning the test to find the simple answer to a question. It truly requires them to read and think.
I can see how it makes a difference depending on the subject as to which approach you would take as a teacher. When reading math or science, it may be more important to understand the information at surface value. Students may need to know definitions or processes. Questions that require questioning the author or giving your opinion would be left to literature class. You want to see that your students understand the text rather than the author’s take.
I like the idea of having students question the teacher. I could see that being very beneficial. Students can feel that they have the power of the teacher for a minute. It will give them the chance to feel in power while asking the questions they are curious about, and this can lead to a learning opportunity. It requires the teacher be ready for anything and may make you feel more vulnerable.
Graphic representations have always helped me. They help make science make so much more sense. When you are dealing with a process or a more abstract idea, it is a lot easier to see the whole picture when you break it down into a graphic organizer. It can help fill in the gaps with stories as well. You can start with a point and expand upon it.
Compare and contrast always seemed like the easy way out to me. It was the lazy way to deal with a topic. It may make sense for something, but overall I do not particularly like it. It just seems like an easy way to approach a topic and leaves all the work to the students. It would be the method I would be least likely to use of all the ones mentioned.
Reading:
Apparently Science teachers are facing a lot these days. We need to be more acquainted with our subject matter. Teachers are not familiar enough with their material. Teachers also have varied ideas on the nature of science. That can often create issues in the classroom. We need to be more familiar with how students learn and understand science too. If we do not, then we will never be successful in teaching our students. We also need to understand how to set up our classroom to be a productive environment and how to manage our class with this atmosphere. Professionalism is something that needs to be continually developing as a teacher. There are a lot of things to constantly be mindful as a teacher. This just reminds me of this fact. It almost feels overwhelming at times like these.
I can agree with all of the “attitudinal differences” mentioned in the article. I am guilty of them myself prior to being in education classes. I can also imagine that a lot of my math/science teachers feel the same way. These do seem to be truths sadly. It is something that is not easy to change, and it is especially hard to change overnight. Math and science teachers do need to be more open when it comes to using other sources outside of the textbook. It could only enhance learning. You do have more chance to put in your opinion or argue something in an English or history class. We are taught more problem solving in math and science. We seek to find the answers. It was interesting that they made a math problem using and STD. Whatever works I guess. At least it is real world related. The physics problem using plate tectonics was interesting. It was a reminder of how heavily vocabulary is used in science and therefore literacy is necessary.
This article showed me that science and math is as important as I always viewed it. We are not equipping students to get out there and join the work force. They need more skill in these areas and our schools sometimes do not focus on these areas enough. This leaves room for remediation down the road and for employers to train in areas they hoped employees would be efficient. This article also points out that we are losing quickly to China and India. I have always complained that we need to be preparing our students here to do the jobs of the future, otherwise there will be no jobs available and no one will be equipped to do any of the jobs that are available. The bottom line is that math and science is important, especially today in our world of technology. If we do not start treating them as important, we will soon be left behind.
Education should be open to everyone and is essential for life today. It needs to be structured from the ground up. There is still much reform that needs to take place and we need to make sure there is opportunity for everyone. Education needs to be structured in a way that everyone has the chance to be equipped with the skill that will allow them to amount to great things. We still do a good job of tending to the privileged and leaving out the poor and less privileged in education today. This is something we need to continually work on in order to close the achievement gap. Grassroots movements like this can help us push in the right direction to see the reform and change that we still need in the classroom.